- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:07:46 -0500
- To: Sharron Rush <sharronrush@hotmail.com>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Sharron, I made some quick changes to address this. We can talk about it at the EOWG telecon... Best, ~Shawn Judy Brewer wrote: > Hi Sharron, Shawn, & EOWG > > Thanks for pulling together these draft comments on the eGov doc draft. > > Some quick comments follow while you're wrapping up your draft comments > to the eGov IG. > > But first just as an FYI, in my own comments I'll be proposing a > TOC-level heading under "What are the main issues...?" that more > explicitly calls out accessibility for PWD as a significant eGov issue, > perhaps in place of their current 4th-tier bullet "Inclusive Access to > Information" which touches on the issue but somewhat more vaguely. Also, > I plan to suggest additional text for the accessibility topic, including > brief references to the extent of policy activity in accessibility and > mention of the significance of standards harmonization in achieving > accessibility-related policy goals. I may not have my own comments ready > till this weekend, and while I'll cc EOWG when I send them, they won't > be solely addressing accessibility issues. > > - For your text, two suggestions: instead of "Web Access is Essential > for Equal Opportunity" I suggest using "Web Accessibility is Essential > for... " here. It is much less ambiguous. > > - Also, the text in this paragraph is re-using stuff that I wrote and/or > co-wrote years ago. I generally try to use more updated phrasing these > days, since in many if not most countries the Web has indeed already > spread into most areas of society and daily life, and it has also > already replaced traditional resources. I don't have handy a complete > re-write of the paragraph at the moment, but please re-tweak the tenses > in this paragraph. I'm also looking at the following paragraphs in your > comments, some of which are also familiar wording, but I'm wondering > whether all of the detail here is still necessary or entirely relevant > for the eGov document. I wondering whether it might be replaced with > something more forward-looking... for the time being, given the tight > timeline, perhaps it is best to keep these paragraphs, with a few tweaks > to the first paragraph; and if I get a chance over the weekend I may > suggest some alternative text in my comments to the eGov IG that > complements the intent of your comments. > > Best, > > - Judy > > -- > Want an accessible Web site? > Check out the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ > > Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 > Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium > (W3C) > MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G526 > 32 Vassar Street > Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA > > >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 00:07:58 UTC