- From: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:27:13 -0800
- To: "EOWG \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, <wai@w3.org>
The translations priority document reads well. I only have one difficulty. Without the techniques WCAG 2 is pretty hard to implement. It is very clear that the Techniques are not stable, but will they ever be stable. Isn't that the point. They change with technology. So, I think for now we should keep them where they are in the document for now, but we should probably move them to high priority as soon as possible. We may also add language that says something like, "The Techniques are not stable enough for translation now, but as soon as they are stable enough the are a critical companion document for WCAG 2.0." I really line all the changes, and it is easier to read...even in very large print. Wayne Wayne
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 00:28:55 UTC