RE: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion

+1

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yeliz Yesilada
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 7:02 AM
To: EOWG (E-mail)
Subject: Re: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion


+1

Yeliz.
On 19 Sep 2008, at 13:37, Helle Bjarnø wrote:

> Me too +1
>
> ~ Helle
>
> From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Henny Swan
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 7:13 AM
> To: William Loughborough
> Cc: shawn@w3.org; w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion
>
> I think that makes a lot of sense, great suggestion.
>
> + 1
>
> Henny
>
> On 18 Sep 2008, at 19:25, William Loughborough wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> Love.
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
>
> >>    <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/>
>
> From:    "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
>
> I just wanted to suggest using "audio and video content" instead of
> "multimedia content". What do most people call those things on You
> Tube?
> videos. What do people rent at Netflix, Blockbuster, and Hollywood
> Video?
> videos. People don't think of videos as video only with no audio
> content.
> So if you used "audio and video content", I think you would capture
> all
> the types of content covered under guideline 1.2 and avoid the
> issue that
> multimedia is often confused with "Flash".
>
> Andi
> andisnow@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Henny Swan
> Web Evangelist
> www.opera.com (work)
> www.iheni.com (personal)
>
> Study the Web Standards Curriculum www.opera.com/wsc
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 14:28:05 UTC