- From: Henny Swan <hennys@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:13:08 +0100
- To: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
- Cc: shawn@w3.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 05:17:40 UTC
I think that makes a lot of sense, great suggestion. + 1 Henny On 18 Sep 2008, at 19:25, William Loughborough wrote: > +1 > > Love. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > > >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/> > > From: "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com> > > I just wanted to suggest using "audio and video content" instead of > "multimedia content". What do most people call those things on You > Tube? > videos. What do people rent at Netflix, Blockbuster, and Hollywood > Video? > videos. People don't think of videos as video only with no audio > content. > So if you used "audio and video content", I think you would capture > all > the types of content covered under guideline 1.2 and avoid the issue > that > multimedia is often confused with "Flash". > > Andi > andisnow@us.ibm.com > > > > --- Henny Swan Web Evangelist www.opera.com (work) www.iheni.com (personal) Study the Web Standards Curriculum www.opera.com/wsc
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 05:17:40 UTC