- From: Sylvie duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:25:55 +0200
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
hello Andrew and all, here are some comments on document comparison at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/comparative.html> I like the introduction which is very clear. 1. for the title, many of suggested titles are too long and complicated. my preferences are for: "Comparison of literature on senior accessibility to the web compared to WAI guidelines", or: "Comparison of WAI guidelines against the requirements of older Web users identified in the literature". 2. In the list of items gathering what the appendix includes, second bullet refers to UTAG and not UAAG. 3. In first table, perceivable : "Avoid bold body-text (except for emphasis)", "Avoid underlined text (do use for links)," "Avoid fluorescent colours", "Ensure links change colour after visit", "Clearly separate links": : in the column for wcag 2.0 it refers to perceivable, which has no guideline number nor success criteria number, but only principle name. Could it be more precise ? Same question for: "Ensure links change colour after visit", "Clearly separate links ", which refer to perceivable operable. Best regards Sylvie
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 12:25:09 UTC