- From: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:20 +0100
- To: sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Sylvie, Thanks for your comments. Regarding the "Link text not descriptive" in the section "operable". What about these? Do you think these are more descriptive? Disabilities Context: User can not determine purpose of a link when read out of context. For example, some assistive technologies such as screen readers provide a functionality to access only the links in a page and when this functionality is used links will be accessed out of context. Mobile Context: User can not determine purpose of a link and especially the page that it points to, and following a wrong link can mean undue delay and cost to a mobile Web user. Regards, Yeliz. On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Sylvie duchateau wrote: > > Hello Shawn, Yeliz and all, > I did a mistake in replying to Shawn's e-mail so I resend my > response to the list. > I will not participate in the next calls due to vacation but I would > like to comment on the last published draft of Mobile-Accessibility > "Shared Web Experiences" doc at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences > > As stated in my comments in the survey, I like this document very much > and find its title really good, as it summarises the document and > is not > too long. > Nevertheless, I find the new formulation of the document containing > the > table version and the one containing the topics version not clear > enough. > The table version contains also some topics as it classifies the > information around the four principles of accessibility. In the > table of > contnts you also find links to each topic. > If I would like to go to the topic version, I would not click on the > link called "topic format", as it does not tell me clearly that > this is > a linearised version of the table format. When reading the former > "linear version" link, the information was clearer to me. > I don't understand why it is a problem to talk about linear or table > version. Some people rather look at data in a tabular form, other > would > rather read a document in a text form. > As far as the rest of the document is concerned, it is very clear > except > the topic: "Link text not descriptive" in the section "operable". I'm > still not satisfied with the explanations for users with disabilities > and users of mobile Web devices that are nearly the same but do not > describe what the barrier is. > Original sentence: > "Disabilities Context: User can not determine purpose of link when > read > out of context". > Proposal: Disabilities Context: Some assistive technologies (screen > reader, magnifier or speech recognition software) have the ability to > display a list of links so that the user can go to the page he > wants to > lookt at more rapidly. Links are read out of context and user can not > determine the purpose of each link. > 2. Original text : Mobile Context: User can not determine purpose > of link. > > Question: I don't know browser on mobile devices very well so why > is the > user prevented from determining the purpose of the link? Is there a > functionality to display a list of links, like the assistive > technologies of people with disabilities? > As I don't konw the answer, I cannot write a good explanation. > That's all for my comments on the document. > Best > Sylvie > > Shawn Henry a écrit : >> EOWG, >> Good job on getting an updated draft of "Shared Web Experiences: >> Barriers Common to Mobile Device Users and People with >> Disabilities" published this week. Thanks to Yeliz for editing, >> and to all who reviewed the document. >> We announced it along with the MWBP 1.0 publication: >> * WAI IG email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/ >> 2008JulSep/0026.html >> * MWBP press release: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/mwbp- >> pressrelease.html.en >> Note that the press release includes: "W3C is also developing >> resources to help authors understand how to create content that is >> both mobile-friendly and accessible to people with disabilities. A >> draft of Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBP) and >> Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) is jointly published >> by the The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group and WAI's >> Education & Outreach Working Group (EOWG)." >> We made a few additional changes, which are listed in the >> changelog at: >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag#changed28July2008 >> The next step is to publish a completed version, not a "Draft". If >> you did not review it before, or if you want to do a more thorough >> review, please do that this week and prepare for discussion in the >> teleconferences. >> *Fri 1 August*: Discuss in EOWG: >> - Having one or two versions (table and linear), and what to call >> them >> - Detailed review of the content >> If possible, please send comments via e-mail before the >> teleconference. >> - Issues for discussion to this list <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> >> - Typos and such to <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk> *and* <wai-eo- >> editors@w3.org> >> Thanks, >> ~Shawn > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 16:32:12 UTC