Re: Mnemonic, acronym, name or handle for Mobile Web document

If this is going to be a handle from the WAI site, could you just say "Mobile Web Overlap"?  Because it's coming from the WAI site, the accessibility part is understood.

For a title, how about  - "How Web Accessibility and the Mobile Web Overlap"


******************
Justin Thorp
US Library of Congress
Web Services - Office of Strategic Initiatives
e - juth@loc.gov
p - 202/707-9541

>>> Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> 11/29/2007 2:45 PM >>>

It needs something. "Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines" is too long. fyi, for the agenda and such I found myself using: "MWBP-WCAG Relationship" and "MWBP-WCAG Overlap"

Do you hear people saying, "Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite" or "new technologies to make JavaScript, Ajax, and stuff accessible"? No, they happily say "ARIA".

Rather than think of a jargony acronym, think of a short "handle" that makes it easy to talk about the concept. That is, it needn't be letters from a title, it can be a short word or phrase that is similar to the title. e.g,. the "WAI-AGE" project is actually titled: "Web Accessibility Initiative: Ageing Education and Harmonisation"

Note that it should be easy to *say*. ("MWBP" is not easy for me to say, and "WCAG" is not for some.)

Mobile&Accessible... Mobile/Accessibility... MobAcc - MobiAcc - MobWac - MobiWac - AccMobi...
Let the brainstorming continue... :)

~Shawn


Swan, Henny wrote:
> I'm wondering if it needs an acronym as well. I always acronyms with
> standards or best practice guidelines but not with other documents.  I'm
> finding the use of WAC a little confusing as well as I muddle it with
> Web Access Centre (WAC) which is how my team is referred to and our
> online presence on the RNIB site...but that will just be me!

justin:
> While acronyms can be helpful, they can also act as a barrier to
> understanding... they become inside baseball jargon. I'm just weary of
> this important concept getting lost in one more acronym that people
> would have to learn and remember.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mnemonic, acronym, name or handle for Mobile Web document
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:37:12 +0000
Resent-From: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org 
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:36:54 +0100
From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>


For the creative minds in the group or anyone who has trouble getting
to sleep at night, we need to think up some short way of referring to
the [breathe in] "Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0
and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines document".

Liam suggested for acronyms: "MOBACC" and "MOBWAC (Mobile / Web
Accessibility)"  I thought about "AccMobi" but it sounds like an
existing trade name.

The keywords are:
Mobile Web Best Practices Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
removing the redundant "Web" word gives
Web Mobile Best Practices Content Accessibility Guidelines

I think it would be good to keep "Best Practices" and "Guidelines" to
emphasise that it's about those documents and not the concepts in
general.

Let's brainstorm...

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 20:00:00 UTC