- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:19:02 +0100
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I don't think WCAG and MWBP are official but we use them all the time. I thought it would just be internal but people will probably want to use it in different contexts and especially when speaking. Alan On 29/11/2007, Justin Thorp <juth@loc.gov> wrote: > > Would the acronym be in the document or would it just be for internal use? > > - justin > > ****************** > Justin Thorp > US Library of Congress > Web Services - Office of Strategic Initiatives > e - juth@loc.gov > p - 202/707-9541 > > >>> "Alan Chuter" <achuter@technosite.es> 11/29/2007 4:36 AM >>> > > For the creative minds in the group or anyone who has trouble getting > to sleep at night, we need to think up some short way of referring to > the [breathe in] "Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 > and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines document". > > Liam suggested for acronyms: "MOBACC" and "MOBWAC (Mobile / Web > Accessibility)" I thought about "AccMobi" but it sounds like an > existing trade name. > > The keywords are: > Mobile Web Best Practices Web Content Accessibility Guidelines > removing the redundant "Web" word gives > Web Mobile Best Practices Content Accessibility Guidelines > > I think it would be good to keep "Best Practices" and "Guidelines" to > emphasise that it's about those documents and not the concepts in > general. > > Let's brainstorm... > > -- > Email: achuter@technosite.es > Blogs > http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619 > > > > > -- Email: achuter@technosite.es Blogs http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 16:19:18 UTC