- From: Justin Thorp <juth@loc.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:15:19 -0500
- To: "Alan Chuter" <achuter@technosite.es>,"EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Would the acronym be in the document or would it just be for internal use? - justin ****************** Justin Thorp US Library of Congress Web Services - Office of Strategic Initiatives e - juth@loc.gov p - 202/707-9541 >>> "Alan Chuter" <achuter@technosite.es> 11/29/2007 4:36 AM >>> For the creative minds in the group or anyone who has trouble getting to sleep at night, we need to think up some short way of referring to the [breathe in] "Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines document". Liam suggested for acronyms: "MOBACC" and "MOBWAC (Mobile / Web Accessibility)" I thought about "AccMobi" but it sounds like an existing trade name. The keywords are: Mobile Web Best Practices Web Content Accessibility Guidelines removing the redundant "Web" word gives Web Mobile Best Practices Content Accessibility Guidelines I think it would be good to keep "Best Practices" and "Guidelines" to emphasise that it's about those documents and not the concepts in general. Let's brainstorm... -- Email: achuter@technosite.es Blogs http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 15:16:07 UTC