- From: Liam McGee <liam@communis.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:50:38 +0000
- To: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Wayne Dick wrote: > I agree with the pixel argument. Maybe I should just not make the weaker part of the argument. I agree with you that horizontal scrolling is more of a perceivability than vertical scrolling because we read line by line horizontally - so much more scrolling required if the overlap is horizontal than if the overlap is vertical. I guess it just depends on where you draw the line on 'sufficiently perceivable'. Thanks for the comments, by the way! Request comments on this as an alternative: Replace "text is resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent in a way that does not require the user to scroll horizontally to read a line of text." With "text is resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent in a way that does not cause characters to be partially or fully hidden or overlapped by other elements on the page"
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:50:56 UTC