- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:19:05 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, Thanks for making these changes, looks really good. Just a couple of comments for your consideration: Slide #1: - Current wording: "The Notes section contains...on this slide, the notes start with..." - Suggestion: "The Notes section on each slide contains...on each slide, the notes section starts with..." - Rationale: clarify that the notes section is on each slide (rather than part of the presentation) Slide #5: - Current wording "WCAG ... Optimized for" - Suggestion: consider clarifying that you mean the WCAG *document* -I initially read it as the WCAG *resources* as you do refer to some of them in later slides (Quick Referece, Techniques, FAQ, ...). Instructions: - Current wording: "It does not cover the actual requirements in WCAG 2.0, basics of Web accessibility, the business case for accessibility, policies, laws, or other aspects of accessibility. For material covering these topics, see the WAI Resources list." - Suggestion: consider putting this information as part of the "Content Outline" subsection. Instructions: - Current wording: "Image credits and information on permission to use are included in the Notes section where the image first appears." - Suggestion: "Image credits and information on permission to use (if used separately from the presentation) are included in the Notes section where the image first appears." Instructions: - Current wording: "Additionally, you are granted permission to create modifications or derivatives of the material." - Question: this permission does not include the images, correct? Regards, Shadi Shawn Henry wrote: > > EOWG Participants, > > I have made the changes from the questionnaires, email comments, and > Friday's teleconference discussion. The only remaining items are: > - For slide 22, create a mock Web page with questionable colour > contrast, which William volunteered to work on. > - For slide 8, consider adding some info about the # of contributors (in > Notes). [maybe also/instead countries. Liam: “put in some killer stats > -- how many people have collaborated to date on WCAG2? How many comments > were received on each working draft so far?" consider using the number > of (Wendy's) Call for Review list.] I have asked for this info. > - Put in the correct URIs for the instructions page. > - Create HTML/CSS version. > > If you can review it one more time this week, please check for potential > problems or misunderstandings with a person using the presentation who > is not familiar with WCAG 2.0. > > ACTION ITEM REQUEST > * We need someone to create the HTML/CSS version of the presentation. > Please contact me if you or a colleague is willing to help with this. > > Links: > - Instructions http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/wcag20pres/wcag20pres > - Presentation > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/wcag20pres/wcag20intro.ppt in > presentation format > - Presentation > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/wcag20pres/wcag20intro.doc in word > processing format > > - Requirements/analysis http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-wcag20pres > - Instructions questionnaire > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wcag20pres-cover1/ > - Presentation questionnaire > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wcag20pres-easy1/ > > Regards, > ~Shawn > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 15:19:10 UTC