RE: WCAG 2.0 presentation : open issues

Hello,
Apologies for not participating in the discussion yet, but I've been
interstate again this week and our email remote access failed :(
Anyway, I'm in agreement with Sylvie - order A will generally be the
most useful, at least at this stage. Order B will be more appropriate
after WCAG 2.0 is a TR and we are talking about in more general forums
including introductory session about accessibility.
Andrew
______________________
Dr Andrew Arch
Manager Online Accessibility Consulting
Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions
Ph. +61 (0)3 9864 9282; Mob: 0438 755 565
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/ais/


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sylvie duchateau
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2007 1:04 AM
To: ewog
Subject: WCAG 2.0 presentation : open issues


Hello Shawn and all,
In "open issues" at:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-wcag20pres
you write :
"In what order should the topics be covered?
Most common, most pressing questions first (a more user-focused
approach) (generally the current organization) (...)
B. General material first"


Those two approaches may be both interesting according to the audience.
When the audience does not know anything about Web accessibility, choice
B may be more appropriate, as they first need to know general
information about Web Accessibility.
If the audience consists of webmasters or people who already know about
WCAG, they will be more interested in a more user friendly presentation
explaining when WCAG will come out and when to start with using them.
This could be a choice that each presenter could take according to his
needs.

nevertheless, I am personnally more in favour of choice a, the user
friendly approach.
Best
Sylvie




________________________________

<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed 4284 Junk messages and set aside
5578 Later for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com

Received on Friday, 27 July 2007 12:21:26 UTC