- From: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:20:09 -0700
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Everyone, I have included links to two pages. The first is my revised AT Definition based on the comments from today: http://www.csulb.edu/~wed/eo/assistive.html The second link http://www.csulb.edu/~wed/eo/accsup.html points to my rewrite of the Accessibility Support Section. It is still not easy reading. That is impossible because the concept is not an easy. I think I have improved the logic sequence and toned the language down to the lowest possible technical level. The criteria for building your own list of accessibility supported technologies is just nasty any way you do it. So I point out that if you want to build your own list you'd better be smart enough to read the rules. I also try to separate the disjoint cases more identifiably. I think it is clearer, but not simple. I really think if you can't read this presentation you probably shouldn't try to build your own list. Just wait on an expert who can. Wayne Wayne Dick PhD Chair Computer Engineering and Computer Science, CSU, Long Beach Coordinator of Academic Technology Accessibility, CSU System
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 07:20:18 UTC