- From: Eric Velleman <E.Velleman@bartimeus.nl>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:05:36 +0100
- To: <shadi@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello Shadi, Very much like your document and the before after website. We use the evaluation report template for our reports all the time. We do about 150 website evaluations per year and the reactions on the format are very good. But in the reports, we cannot add the advice as you did because of EN standard EN17020. Evaluators cannot give advice. That would more or less compromise the independance of their (next) evaluation. Also in doing this you/we would be repeating ourselves all the time as we see the same problems on many websites. As a solution, we point to a seperate brochure with all the explanations and many practical code examples. If we encounter a new problem, we add a new part to the brochure. My advice would be to take the advice out and point to another resource for that like the curriculum. Also it would be good to add the resources that were in the scope/sample at the end of the document, although it is quite obvious what they are in this case. For larger websites, this is very interesting and necessary for conformancy with evaluation standards. Kindest regards, Eric Velleman Accessibility Foundation www.accessibility.nl >>> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 10-3-2006 13:48:05 >>> Dear Group, Apologies for the delay in sending this so shortly before the meeting, I've been trying to put in everything we need for discussion on today's call. Please find the evaluation report for the Before/After Demo (BAD): <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/report> Note: each of the sections in this report has enough content for intense discussions so I propose that we use today's time to focus on the overall structure and organization of the report. Specifically the following aspects: * If you were expecting an evaluation report for your Web site, is this the type of information you would want in it? (Consider being a manager or a developer) * If you were writing an evaluation report for a Web site, does this report help you as a model to follow? * If you wanted to learn more about Web accessibility, does the evaluation sufficiently outline some of the issues? Looking forward to your input. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 17:05:05 UTC