- From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:08:36 +1000
- To: "EOWG \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
>From Wayne Dick -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Dick [mailto:wed@csulb.edu] Sent: Tuesday, 16 May 2006 3:32 AM To: Andrew Arch Subject: Re: [DRAFT] EOWG comments on WCAG 2.0 documents I think we should send the comments on. They are all good. In 3.4 found a little typo. 3.4 ... explain that it is intended that you can save [t]he document and add comments to the fourth column as a report. Again in 3.4: The proposal " Alternatively, provide a simpler table and also a downloadable (RTF) document for evaluation reporting and annotation purposes" might be expanded. I don't know if the table complexity is the issue. My wish (and it may be a pipe dream) is to make the checklist form truly interactive. The "True" column might be a "Status" column with a (satisfied/ not satisfied) radio button. The comments column could be text areas for comment entry. Finally the downloaded document might be the filled out form in an RTF format. Given the issue of mission dilation, this may be impossible, but it might be popular. Committed WCAG 2.0 developers will need all they can to ease the work load. Wayne Wayne Dick PhD Chair Computer Engineering and Computer Science Director WebAdapt2Me Project at CSULB __________________________________________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside Later for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 22:09:17 UTC