Re: [DRAFT] EOWG comments on WCAG 2.0 documents

I think we should send the comments 
on.  They are all good.  In 3.4 found 
a little typo.

3.4 ...
explain that it is intended that you 
can save [t]he document and add 
comments to the fourth column as a 
report.

Again in 3.4: The proposal " 
Alternatively, provide a simpler table 
and also a downloadable (RTF) document 
for evaluation reporting and 
annotation purposes" might be 
expanded.

I don't know if the table complexity 
is the issue.  My wish (and it may be 
a pipe dream) is to make the checklist 
form truly interactive.  The "True" 
column might be a "Status" column with 
a (satisfied/ not satisfied) radio 
button.  The comments column could be 
text areas for comment entry. Finally 
the downloaded document might be the 
filled out form in an RTF format. 
 Given the issue of mission dilation, 
this may be impossible, but it might 
be popular.

Committed WCAG 2.0 developers will 
need all they can to ease the work 
load.

Wayne



Wayne Dick PhD
Chair Computer Engineering and 
Computer Science
Director WebAdapt2Me Project at CSULB

Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 18:23:38 UTC