- From: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:58:10 -0700
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- CC: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
1. Comments on the "Requirements for Before/After Site" doc. Minor edit: "Incorrect usage of TDs that render visually but not on some ATs ..." Change ATs to Adaptive Technologies. I would like to see some elements that don't enlarge well. For example: Fixed size vertical frames that contain site map information or A layout table a with a site map row on the top with say 8 options and two columns below for actual content. Enlarging the site map to the point of visibility expands the content columns to the point where they require horizontal scrolling. Question: What do we mean by CMS? 'Content could include: moving up to XHTML once CMS supports it.' 2. Comments on the concept draft BAD page: It is really ugly. First I tried it with style sheets and it did not make sense. Then I tried it in IE with their largest text (no other restyling) and that was ugly too (line spacing was awful). Yes you certainly have demonstrated graceless transformation. Wayne
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 22:58:20 UTC