- From: <hbj@visinfo.dk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:09:01 +0200
- To: "'EOWG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Cc: <achuter@teleservicios.es>
I completely agree with Alan, until I read his mail I had actually no idea what this was all about (I have never read the original document). Cheers Helle > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne af > Alan Chuter > Sendt: 15. juli 2005 08:58 > Til: EOWG > Emne: Re: introduction to CAPTCHA paper. Title ideas > > > I was completely baffled by the name CAPTCHA, until I read the start of > the document. I think that it's so obscure that it may attract people to > read on simply out of curiosity. I think that even "Turing test" will be > unfamiliar to the vast majority of people using the site, even > accessibility specialists. > > Unfortunately the concept of "robot" will be unfamiliar too. I think > perhaps "automatic" would be clearer, like "automated login prevention > system". > > Another approach might be to emphasise "human", like "systems to allow > only human access" or "to prevent non-human access" > > The fact that it is inaccessible makes me think that "barrier" is a useful > word. In some ways the it is deliberately inaccessible, to robots. > "Anti-robot barriers" might be useful. > > I think that the concept is difficult to grasp and we shouldn't > necessarily look for a short, catchy title, for something that is, after > all, a very technical subject. > > best regards > > Alan Chuter > Fundosa Teleservicios > achuter@teleservicios.es > Tel. +34 91 1210335 > > > > En Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:06:35 -0400, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> escribió: > > > > > At 08:40 PM 7/14/2005 -0500, Shawn Henry wrote: > > > >>> 3. Introductory page for WG Note on Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA's > >>> The PFWG is about to publish a Working Group Note which will update > >>> the old Working Draft on CAPTCHA's. This will need an introductory > >>> page, to briefly orient people to the document. > >>> - old Working Draft: > >>> * Inaccessibility of Visually-Oriented Anti-Robot Tests > >>> * http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ > >>> - new Working Draft: > >>> * will probably not be publicly visible before EOWG call, but > >>> will cover most of same issues > >>> - introductory page: > >>> * draft will be posted to EOWG list before teleconference > >> > >> An early draft introductory page is at > >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut3/intro/captcha.php > >> > >> Questions for review and discussion: > >> > >> 1. The title of the Note is too complex and confusing. > > > > Note that the document is being renamed with the upcoming release: the > > new name is the one that I have indicated in the agenda item, > > "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA." The 2ndary heading is "Alternatives to > > Visual Turing Tests on the Web." Sorry not to be clearer. > > > > - Judy > > > >> What should be the title of this introductory page? (e.g., Introduction > >> to Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA Paper, or Introduction to Inaccessibility > >> of Anti-Robot Tests, or Introduction to W3C Note on Anti-Robot Tests > >> or...) > >> - The shortname in the navigation? (Anti-Robot Tests, or Inaccessible > >> CAPTCHA, or Robot or Human Tests, or...) > >> - The filename? (/intro/captcha, or intro/antirobot, or > >> intro/robot-human, or...) > >> > >> 2. Is this draft about the right amount of introduction? Is more > >> needed? Or, should it be even shorter? Does it cover what is needed for > >> an introduction? > > > > > > --
Received on Friday, 15 July 2005 07:09:06 UTC