- From: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:52:24 +0100 (IST)
- cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi All - (Sorry this is so late; in my timezone, Friday morning tends to be when I actually get around to thinking about EO, but I'll try to find some more rational schedule on an ongoing basis.) I generally like the current Highlights draft. They are tight, yet interesting, so very good teasers. I prefer the style with "conventional" linkage from the running text. We did have some conversation about thinking of the Highlights as more "blog like" - having timestamps, exposed authorship, maybe a separate RSS feed, and (implicitly) having items systematically move down the page and off the end with time. I possibly missed some of that discussion due to my connection problems. I see we now have a generic "byline" for edition of the Highlights as a whole, and that works well for me. I do miss any kind of timestamp, in particular, to give some sense of the currency of these items. If the highlights are going to all "turned over" once a month, it may be enough just to add this to the "Highlights" heading itself, rather than stamping each item. Two minor nit-picks (which may be out of scope for today anyway, but just to log them): - What's with the <br /> elements? Maybe they are good, maybe not, I don't quite understand what the intention was... For what it is worth, they did disrupt my own reading, rather than help it. - Not so sure about hiding the <h2> in the footer from "visual" user agents. "How did I know?" you might ask? I toggled on the Firefox outliner extension. But then when I activated the "Document Information" link in the outline, I didn't see any "Document Information" heading in the document and got confused. Yes, this is an unusual use case, so make of it what you will. On the good side, I really liked the structure I saw with the outliner; and I imagine this may work well to enhance access for people with certain kinds of cognitive disability. With possible outliner use in mind, I would also be inclined to add a header (<h2>? <h3>? for the "byline" or "editor" of the Highlights...). Best - Barry.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 10:55:13 UTC