- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:25:18 -0400
- To: "'EOWG'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002a01c4b305$dab0e150$a201a8c0@deque.local>
Shadi writes: >Testing with a focused tool which assists in examining a >specific issue in greater detail may sometimes (for >example during design and development stages) be >more helpful than a full evaluation to determine >conformance. Sailesh: Your point that one needs to focus on a certain checkpoint or a group of related checkpoints is well taken. Likewise it may be necessary not to test for checkpoints that clearly do not apply to a site. For example if my site has no multi media, I need not check for those checkpoints. But consider a company that renders services and has clients with all kinds of websites. So how many focussed tools is the company expected to invest in? A better option is to have a a tool that can do a comprehensive evaluation and allows user to turn on / off the checkpoints that are not to be tested for the time being. And there are tools that can offer that feature not only during evaluation but also during reporting. So one should be able to evaluate against all checkpoints if one wants to but generate separate report for specific checkpoint(s) for use by different developers. I do not subscribe to the concept of focused tools- they are just incomplete tools and the EO doc authors should not legitamize them. All tools should be compared on one scale and one should be able to say that Tool X checks compliance against n checkpoints and Tool Y checks against n + Delta checkpoints. Again are all users in an org expected to learn the user interfaces and idiosyncrancies and features of several tools? Just the experts should evaluate a tool and the org should standardize on one. Then again there are tools that do only eval and some can do eval and repair. So this is a functionality offered and the user should knowingly select one tool that meets his / her needs. Shadi, I also forgot an important feature in my previous mail: the tool should be accessible to users of assistive technologies. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 22:27:17 UTC