- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@popolizio.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:13:15 +0200
- To: 'EOWG' <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <177E047B-F81A-11D8-8B5E-003065C8BE0C@popolizio.com>
Hi all, I completely agree on it. It's very confusing. Regards, Pasquale --------------------------------------------- Pasquale Popolizio pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com pasquale@popolizio.com www.osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com mobile 393.9402244 ICQ 267656437 AIM pasqualepoldo ---------------------------------------------- Il giorno 27/ago/04, alle 12:49, Henk Snetselaar ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Yes it is not easy to find your way! > I made a picture of the WCAG 2.0 jungle, (see attachment) perhaps it > will help to discuss this issue. > > Regards, > Henk > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > H. Snetselaar > Bartimeus Educational Institute for the Blind and Partially Sighted > Utrechtseweg 84, 3702 AD Zeist, the Netherlands > Tel: +31-(0)30-6982211 or +31(0)30-6982350 > Fax: +31-(0)30-6982388 > E-mail: H.Snetselaar@bartimeus.nl > Website: www.bartimeus.nl and www.accessibility.nl > Zie voor disclaimer (Read our disclaimer): > www.accessibility.nl/disclaimer.html > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >>>> <michaeka@wellsfargo.com> 27-8-04 0:34 >>> > > Hello, all - > > Regarding WCAG 2.0 et al., I think there are too many documents, which > makes > navigation confusing. > > Rather than have the three layers described in WCAG 2.0 "How to read > this > document" (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#how-to), layers two and three > could > be combined into one. The checklist and application info for each > technology > would be combined into one technology document (or "document site" if > it was > decided to split the document into separate Web pages). > > This way, the user is either at the overall WCAG 2.0 document or at > the > document for a specific technology, which would make it easier for > users to > know where they are. > > The Gateway to Techniques for WCAG 2.0 > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-GATEWAY-20040730/) adds yet > another > document to the mix. I also find it confusing, both in content and > design. > Its content could be moved to WCAG 2.0 or to the specific technology > documents (or "technology document sites"). > > Each guideline in WCAG 2.0 could include information on: > a. Explanation of what the guideline is - for example: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-GATEWAY-20040730/guideline1.1.html. > Maybe this could be a simple description with a link to a more > in-depth > description of the guideline. > b. Success criteria of the guideline - for example, > http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#text-equiv > <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#perceivable > c. Link to Who Benefits > d. Link to Examples > e. Links to specific technology guidelines > > Regards, > > Blossom > _____________________________________ > Blossom Michaeloff > Web Research and Design > Wells Fargo > 415.222.3045 > michaeka@wellsfargo.com > > <WCAGschema.doc>
Attachments
- text/enriched attachment: stored
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 11:13:50 UTC