W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2004

EOWG: REVISED Agenda for teleconference 13 August 2004

From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:56:40 -0500
To: "'EOWG'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c480e1$2881ab00$d4837544@SLHenry>

REVISION: I updated the Components of Web Accessibility requirements and
rough concept draft (#2 below) based on feedback from the WAI Team and
Charmane's comments to the list. Please review the Purpose in the
Requirements, which should help us focus the document and discussions of
it.

EOWG:

Calling logistics and an agenda for our 13 August 2004 teleconference
follow.

Time:	8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
		http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:	+1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
		instructions on how to mute:
		http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
IRC:		channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
		(to accompany, not replace, call)
Scribe:	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
Meetings:	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#announce

PREPARATION:
* read links under 2. Components of Web Accessibility and prepare to
discuss the questions listed

AGENDA:

1. Outreach updates (brief)
   - please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or
issues for EOWG discussion

2. Components of Web Accessibility - discuss purpose (in requirements)
and rough draft of concept
    - requirements (updated Thur 12 Aug):
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/components
    - latest concept draft (updated Thur 12 Aug):
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/components
    - (previous versions listed at
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/components#brainstorms)

Questions for review and discussion - in this order:

a. is the purpose (in requirements) what we want with the page?

b. does the text convey the message we want to convey?
(please do not focus on specific wording - this is a very rough draft of
the concept only)

c. do the images convey what we want them to convey?

d. does the chunking and flow of the sections work?

e. there are four types of images: people (for user and developer),
content, computer (for tools), computer with document (for specs and
guidelines). does having these image concepts work? (NOT the exact
images - those are bad clipart placeholders for now and would be
replaced!)

3. WCAG 2.0 Working Draft review
    - confirm plans for EOWG discussion and comment
    - Request for review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines 2.0:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004JulSep/0230.html
    - note background from our June discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2004AprJun/0148.html
	minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2004/0618#topic4

4. Reminder: Overview documents sent to the list for review. List of
pages with status: 
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/intro-pages.html#planned

Regards,

Shawn and Judy


Shawn Lawton Henry
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
e-mail: shawn@w3.org
phone: +1.617.253.8788
about: http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/
Received on Friday, 13 August 2004 02:56:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:52 UTC