- From: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:14:41 -0700
- To: hbingham@acm.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
See also: 1. wired.com "PowerPoint is Evil" article: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html. Unfortunately, the article is short. In his seminar "Presenting Data and Information" and in his booklet "The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint," Tufte expresses his thoughts on PowerPoint more in depth. 2. Review on Tufte's "The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint": http://contactsheet.org/articles/2003/08/28/the_cognitive_style_of_powerpoin t.html I personally feel slides - HTML or PowerPoint - are most of the time an inefficient and limited way to present information. I've only done them when I've had to and felt very boxed in by the format - ex. only so much info can go on one slide whether or not the concept needs more room to be effectively expressed in one place. Regards, Blossom P.S. As Harvey notes, his books are excellent, and they are included in the price of his excellent seminar. -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Harvey Bingham Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:54 AM To: WAI-EO Subject: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint An excellent putdown of PowerPoint slideshows, by Edward R. Tufte, www.edwardtufte.com summarized as "Powerpoint Phluff." Ed Tufte is a trenchant critiquer of how information is presented. His books are excellent -- worth much serious study. Do you remember his "chart junk?" "Powerpoint has a distinctive, definite, well-enforced, and widely-practiced cognitive style that is contrary to serious thinking." See for a prime PP putdown; Peter Norvig's: "The Gettysburg Address" in PP www.norvig.com Some essons carry over to the W3C slide-maker. Regards/Harvey
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 15:16:02 UTC