- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:00:42 -0500
- To: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <011701c3ecd2$c1851ec0$a201a8c0@deque.local>
It would have been really useful if it had done what its name suggests. But it has not really looked at the tools' ability / accuracy in detecting/ correcting violations. That I believe is the essence of such a study. User interface,reporting capabilities and platforms support are addressed by the study and are useful factors for comparison when the tools being compared have similar abilities and accuracy in detecting / correcting violations. I wonder if WAI-E&R should do such a study and list strengths and weaknesses of desktop / server versions of available Web accessibility E&R tools. That will really benefit the community of accessibility developers / auditors. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> * ----- Original Message ----- From: Harvey Bingham To: EOWG Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:59 AM Subject: Web Accessibility Validation and Repair: Which Tools and Why? Nice paper from Laurie Harrison and Laura O'Grady, Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto http://snow.utoronto.ca/access/evaltoolreview/validation.html Deals with users using non-standard devices or software to surf the web. Regards/Harvey
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 11:51:03 UTC