W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2004

social factors

From: Blossom Michaeloff <bmichaeloff@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:40:30 -0600
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20040122211603.00ac0858@pop.mindspring.com>
Hi, Shawn -

I don't believe I can post directly to the EO list from my home
computer, 
so could you post the following to the list?

...

Subject: Social Factors

I have doubts about using the term "digital divide" in Social Factors.
It 
implies a black and white situation, whereas the reality is shades of
grey. 
Please note the attached article from Scientific American, August 2003: 
"Demystifying the Digital Divide - The simple binary notion of
technology 
haves and have-nots doesn't quite compute" by Mark Warschauer.

Overview of the article: "The concept of a 'digital divide' separating 
those with access to computers and communications technology from those 
without is simplistic and can lead to well-meaning but incomplete
attempts 
at a solution based on merely adding technology to a given circumstance.

"In fact, people have widely varying opportunities for access to
computers 
and communications technology and disparate reasons for wanting the
level 
of access they may desire.

"A consideration of how people can use computers and the Internet to 
further the process of social inclusion is paramount in any effort to 
install new technology into an environment lacking it."

The original download from Scientific American's Web site is the PDF 
attachment. I've also attached a text version.

Blossom

Received on Friday, 23 January 2004 09:48:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:35 UTC