- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:22:03 -0700
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
At 10:30 AM 8/14/2003 -0400, Judy Brewer wrote: >5. Does the conformance model appear to be: >- clearly defined and implementable? The fine line between EO advice about clarity, etc. and the WG role in deciding what the conformance model should be is IMO being breached by discussions about the conformance model itself, rather than about its clarity and such. When I was in WG for WCAG it was clear that the change from P1 levels to something else was on the agenda and that WHATEVER was decided on would call for exactly the same kinds of arguments that are going on now because of these changes. I really believe that we should leave that up to their WG. It is both a can of worms and a rat hole. I propose that we deal exclusively with the presentation of the conformance model and not with its content, else we be drawn down the same rat hole. -- Love. It's Bad Luck to be Superstitious!
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 12:24:58 UTC