- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:18:26 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <007a01c360f5$be270c70$9c01a8c0@deque.local>
For your consideration Q9. How clearly does this draft explain questions regarding the transition between WCAG 1.0 and 2.0? Answer: I guess a developer or other user of WCAG 2 will be confused if he has used WCAG 1. WCAG 1.0 tells him that certain things are absolutely necessary for accessibility and now WCAG 2.0 relegates those to "extended" status. Then some that were regarded as only as desirable for accessibility by WCAG 1.0 have suddenly become core in WCAG 2.0. Consider that: i. Five WCAG 1.0 checkpoints including 3 P1 map to an extended WCAG 2 checkpoint 4.2 about declaring technology/providing alternative content. ii. Five P2 checkpoints make a core 4.1 checkpoint on usage specs. iii. One P1 and two P3 checkpoints make an extended checkpoint 3.3 under Wcag 2.0 on content complexity. This has given rise to an inconsistency and the first unresolved issue stated on the page for "Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and the WCAG 2.0 Working Draft" That is why it is necessary for the document to say why some checkpoints are core and some are extended. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems Inc 11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 Fax: 703-225-0387 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 13:13:12 UTC