- From: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:00:52 +1100
- To: jbrewer@w3.org
- Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org
Selecting and using Authoring Tools
(http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/impl/software4)
Selecting new or replacement software:
extra question - Can a suite of tools be established to provide
the accessibility that the prefered authoring tool lacks?
Working around limitation of existing tools
Do we need to include a point about 'correcting accessibility
issues' as part of hte last point?
Examples
3. "... in conjunction with a caption ..."
4a. "print media (...)" -> "print media (pagemaker, quark
express, acrobat)"
4b. "rich media (...)" -> "rich media (flash, director)"
4c. "presentation formats" -> "presentations"
6/7. dtd & css tools - should we point to any?
8 - what about the WAVE for checking?
Cheers, Andrew
_________________________________
Dr Andrew Arch
Manager, Internet Product Development
Vision Australia Foundation
Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210
Mobile 0438 755 565
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/
Member, Education & Outreach Working Group,
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 02:06:50 UTC