- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <Shawn@UIAccess.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:55:10 -0500
- To: "EOWG \(E-mail\) \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
In reference to the following messages: Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:03:56 -0400 From: Chuck Letourneau Changed "usability testing" to "user testing of accessibility features" at [http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#clj ]. Also changed heading for section 3.4 from "Usability evaluation" to "User testing of accessibility features" at [http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#clk ] From: "Alan Chuter" <achuter@teleservicios.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:10:28 +0200 "usability testing" and "user testing of accessibility features" are different. Maybe "accessibility testing by users" is more precise. The term "accessibility features" gives me this impression that only specific features concerned with accessibility are tested, which is very different to usability testing. --- I second Alan's concern with "user testing of accessibility features" First issue: many people use the term "user testing" to mean "usability testing". So there is really no distinction between the two for most people. And I feel very strongly that "usability testing" is a much better term than "user testing". (Which I can elaborate on if necessary.) Second issue: limiting it to "accessibility features" could be interpreted as just testing a specific accessibility feature (e.g., when I change font size in browser, thee fonts change on the page) versus the usability of the entire page under "accessibility conditions" (e.g., that large fonts don't cause unnecessary horizontal scrolling). So, the question is: What was the intention behind the change? Was it only to specify usability testing for accessibility issues, versus general usability testing? Was it to clarify that we mean usability testing under accessibility conditions (e.g., with person who is blind and uses a ascreen reader, etc.)? OK, now I'm suppose to suggest wording to provide a concrete "strawman" for discussion - so here goes: location: 3. 4. title working draft 13 June: "User testing of accessibility features" suggested change: "Usability testing for accessibility" location: first sentence in 3. Conformance... working draft 13 June: "A comprehensive evaluation combines semi-automatic, manual, and user testing of accessibility features." suggested change: "A comprehensive evaluation combines semi-automatic, manual, and usability testing." location: 4. ... Ongoing monitoring, NOTE at end of section working draft 13 June: "Steps like repeated user testing may only be required after major template or content changes." suggested change: "Steps like repeated usability testing may only be required after major template or content changes." --- - Shawn
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 10:56:38 UTC