some comments on pending documents

hi all,

Since I missed last Friday's call, I send a couple of short comments (minutes 
are not posted, so apologies if this is closed).

Judy Brewer wrote:

> 2. Latest Revision of Implementation Plan
>         
> http://www.dartmouth.edu/~shorton/eowg/implementation/13dec2001.html


In the section "Make Your Web Site Accessible," I would word the first point:
     *  Build accessibility into first drafts and site templates.

I consider the rest, a very good reference.


> 3. First Draft of Selecting Software
>         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/impl/software

I would add an additional point in the section "Vendor Queries", in the category 
"When selecting new or replacement software", I would reword:
     Which applications are more conformant with ATAG 1.0?
into:
     Which applications are more conformant with ATAG 1.0, or at least
     do not overwrite markup introduced by the author?

Just some thoughts.

Regards,
carlos
-- 
Dr Carlos A Velasco
mailto:velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de    http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik (FIT.HEB)
   [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.HEB)]
   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
   Tel: +49-2241-142609/319272 Fax: +49-2241-142065

Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:51:42 UTC