- From: Andrew Arch <amja@optushome.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 23:39:46 +1100
- To: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org>
Hi Judy, A few comments: 1. A great start - well done! 2. Introduction 2.1 wrt "explains to software developers how to make software that supports production of accessible Web sites and is accessible to people with disabilities" Try "explains to software developers how to make web authoring software that is accessible to people with disabilities and supports production of accessible Web sites" 2.2 wrt "questions that one can ask of software vendors to identify more conformant" Try "questions that one can ask of software vendors or custom authoring system developers to identify more conformant" 3. Software Guidelines 3.1 wrt "ATAG 1.0 advises ... and more" I stronly think that we should mention that the pe\roducts should be accessible (i.e. usable) by people with disabilities. 3.2 wrt "database-generation tools" maybe should be "database-driven content management tools" 3.3 Can we include a point along the line that smaller, stand-alone tools will comply more quicly than large CMS due to their realtively shorter development and upgrade life-cycles? 3.4 Can we also inlcude a point about being aware of the failings/limitations of your authoring tool(s) and compensating with management processes where possible 4. Product Reviews 4.1 Charles' comments cover most of what I would have said here. 4.2 "WAI maintains links to accessibility pages for many developers" may be better as "WAI maintains links to accessibility pages for many mainstream authoring tool developers" as there are no CMS companies listed and there are unlikely to be small bespoke authoring system developers ever listed. I actually have a few links that could be added to this page. (Judy, can I amend page, or should I send to editors?) 5. Vendor Queries 5.1 When selecting new or replacement software - add subpoint along the lines of "Which vendors acknowledge their incomplete ATAG 1.0 conformance and list the areas of non-conformance to allow you to better manage your accessibility goals" 5.2 When reviewing software procurement practices - change subpont one from "allow purchase" to "encourage purchase" Well, my two-bob's worth of comment. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org> To: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:50 PM Subject: First draft of "Selecting Software for Developing Accessible Web Sites" > One of the auxiliary resources that we have needed in order to complete the > resource suite for "Implementation Planning for Web Accessibility" > is "Selecting Software for Developing Accessible Web Sites." > > I've written a first draft of this, based on our discussion last week. > There is no simple answer to give people on this issue at this time, but > I've tried to capture some guidance on how to find out more information and > make decisions about software selection. > > Please note that it is set up as though it were part of the implementation > planning resource suite, even though the other documents in the suite do > not yet have matching navigation bars, nor are they linked to this draft yet. > > Please take a look and let's discuss it at our meeting today: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/impl/software > > Thanks, > > - Judy > > > -- > Judy Brewer jbrewer@w3.org +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI > Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA > >
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 07:42:34 UTC