- From: Andrew Arch <amja@optushome.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 19:42:35 +1000
- To: "Kathleen Anderson" <kathleen.anderson@po.state.ct.us>
- Cc: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Kathleen, Another one for the collection - have you seen it? Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au> To: "Andrew Arch" <amja@optushome.com.au> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:13 PM Subject: Corporate Style Guides > Send to Kathleen > > > ----- Forwarded by Andrew Arch/Kooyong/AFTB on 17/10/01 13:13 ----- > > Patrick Burke > <burke@ucla.edu To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: Corporate Style Guides > w3c-wai-ig-requ > est@w3.org > > > 09/10/01 05:39 > > > > > > > The following article highlights a good leverage point for us. If we can > get accessibility referenced in & worked into these corporate guidelines > ... it'd be good. > > Site designing gets makeover after the dot com meltdown > Loss of confidence has fuelled a new IT industry: making existing Web sites > > better. > http://it.mycareer.com.au/opinion/webmechanic/2001/10/02/FFXLS2R59SC.html?ND ailyT > > > (Despite the headline, the dot com meltdown doesn't really figure into the > story.) > > An example cited is AT&T: > > http://www.att.com/style/ > > Patrick > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 06:04:37 UTC