W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Review of Web Site Accessibility -- Planning

From: Laurence Bergman <laurenceb@wecorp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 13:45:29 -0400
To: "'Harvey Bingham'" <hbingham@acm.org>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00bc01bfb139$8b707b00$5301a8c0@wecorp.com>
I have independently been drafting a Web site accessibility rating algorithm
stemming from the work that Jakob Lindenmeyer and Reto Ambühler had
presented at last year's WWW8 conference.  I am not developing it with
accessibility defined on a single scale though, such as 0-100, but rather in
five different "spheres."
These include:

I am trying to derive whether sites are particularly biased against one
modality, or is it generalised.  For instance, does a site with AA
conformance but lacking graphical cues also benefit a person with a learning
impairment?  Would a rating system  similar to what Zagat's restaurant
guides does, where different facets of the experience are evaluated, be
useful when coupled with search engine results? Once I have a more suitable
baseline, I will forward additional information.


Laurence Bergman
Director of Product Development
We Media Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Harvey Bingham
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 12:46 PM
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Subject: Re: Review of Web Site Accessibility -- Planning

Evaluation and Repair has some changed info worthy of inclusion in


Bullets 1 and 2, adjust to the new ER Title Change:
"Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Evaluation and Repair Tools"

Work in progress there:

"Rating Algorithm for Evaluation of Web Pages"


"Evaluation, Repair and Transformation Tools for Web Content Accessibility"


Regards/Harvey Bingham
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 13:47:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:29 UTC