- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 16:50:34 -0400
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Geoff Freed <Geoff_Freed@wgbh.org>, Madeleine Rothberg <Madeleine_Rothberg@wgbh.org>, marja@w3.org, ij@w3.org, ph@w3.org, robneff@home.com
- CC: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Robert Neff wrote: > > 8. file extensions RM and RTX are used without explanation. are there more > > extensions? See item 3 Here's an example: <audio src="audio.rm"> <textstream src="closed-caps.rtx"> Should we include the suffixes at all? I don't know how SMIL players handle content negotiation, but if possible, shouldn't we promote it? Of course, we could still show examples with suffixes, but indicate that content negotiation is preferred. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814
Received on Friday, 13 August 1999 20:00:57 UTC