Content negotiation and SMIL players.

Robert Neff wrote:
> > 8.  file extensions RM and RTX are used without explanation.  are there more
> > extensions?  See item 3

Here's an example:

   <audio src="audio.rm">
   <textstream src="closed-caps.rtx">

Should we include the suffixes at all? I don't know 
how SMIL players handle content negotiation,
but if possible, shouldn't we promote it?

Of course, we could still show examples
with suffixes, but indicate that content
negotiation is preferred.

 - Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel/Fax:                     +1 212 684-1814

Received on Friday, 13 August 1999 20:00:57 UTC