- From: Robert Neff <robneff@home.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 21:53:06 -0700
- To: "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org>, "Geoff Freed" <Geoff_Freed@wgbh.org>, "Madeleine Rothberg" <Madeleine_Rothberg@wgbh.org>, <marja@w3.org>, <ij@w3.org>
Items 1 and 3 are somewhat inter-linked. The question is how much clarity is needed? I tend to be a vrey visually oriented person and use the text to define the process and the visual to aid in understanding. I think screen shots would help you along to support the series if a car changing positions or moving faster while some one talks. I do not think this would dilute the process, but would help clarify the points by using screen shots. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> To: Robert Neff <robneff@home.com> Cc: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>; Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>; Geoff Freed <Geoff_Freed@wgbh.org>; Madeleine Rothberg <Madeleine_Rothberg@wgbh.org>; <marja@w3.org>; <ij@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 6:51 AM Subject: Re: Please review Note on SMIL accessibility features > Robert Neff wrote: > > > > here are some comments and just got back form vacation land.... > > > > 1. i would like to see pictorial or GIF examples alongside the code. > > While I agree that images or illustrations may help explain some > features, will static images convey the dynamic issues we are > discussing? Can you say a word about what you would like to see > in images? > > > 2. would like to see a simpler explanation. Many people are going to be > > drawn to this because SMIL is starting to get HOT! would a executive > > summary or purpose be appropriate to tell people in one section "why they > > need this and what it can do for them" > > While an "executive summary" would be useful, that is not the > role of this particular piece. This one is meant for developers > (to understand what features to implement) and authors > who are not necessarily using authoring tools to produce SMIL. > > > 3. I would like to see a pictoral and word flowchart that describe how smile > > file are used and their components. For example, what are the required > > files and what is the directory structure. Not sure what can be done > > without aligning the content with a company (does the file structure differ > > form vendor to vender?). Geoff, one of the biggest problems I had when we > > used it here was trying to make sense of the different files and where they > > needed to be placed) > > I don't believe that this is an accessibility issue. This would > be appropriate for a general SMIL tutorial or FAQ and I'm sure > that a tutorial would help all audiences. However, including > this level of detail in this Note might dilute the accessibility > points we hope to communicate. > > > 4. If i want to make a presentation with the video description, how is this > > to be added...on another track. > > Marja and I will discuss this. > > > 5. I have more notes that i made on the airplane, but need to unpack to > > find them... > > I suggest looking near the shaving kit. <wink> > > > 6. In the sentence, "Dynamic multimedia presentations differ from less > > dynamic pages in some important ways that affect their accessibility to > > people with disabilities:" reword to "Dynamic multimedia presentations > > affect accessibility" not sure what "differ from less dynamic pages in some > > important ways" adds to this? Less dynamic pages are not explained anywhere > > and i found myself caught up in this... > > The goal of the sentence was to juxtapose static pages (a la HTML) > from > more dynamic pages (a la SMIL). However, in editing, we lost the > context that justified this transition. We'll clean it up. > > > 7. need visual examples of discrete and stream.. can we give examples of > > how SMIL can be used? > > It would be nice to link to a demo to show what we mean. Does > anyone have a demo handy that we can put on the W3C Web site? > > > 8. file extensions RM and RTX are used without explanation. are there more > > extensions? See item 3 > > Ok, we'll clarify. > > Thank you for the comments Robert, > > _ Ian > > > -- > Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 1999 21:59:15 UTC