- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:07:00 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>
At 1999-07-16 10:35 AM, you wrote: >My comments prefixed with WC:: > >>PROPOSAL: "Frames. Label with the _title_ or _name_ attribute." >>OR PROPOSAL: "Frames. Use _noframe_, and _title_ or _name_ attribute. (NB: >>"noframe" would be in small caps) >> >WC:: I like the second proposal. This technique is included in checkpoint >6.5, which is P2. HB: Even if it is only in the transitional DTD. Are we continuing that legacy? >We've recently found that at least one browser for PalmOS acts like older >text-based browsers: it give you >a blank screen rather than a list of frame names. > >>Tables. Make line-by-line reading sensible. Summarize. >> >WC:: proposal: Tables. Make line-by-line, single column reading sensible. >Summarize. >however, i don't feel strongly about this, because if the line-by-line >reading is sensible, it is most likely in a single column. HB: Wendy: or any wrapping lengthy stuff is in the final column of the row, so there is no interrupted content in the earlier columns. [Note the writing direction sensitivity for tables in I18N, where left to right cannot be presumed, either for text wrapping, or for column order. > >>PROPOSAL??: Check your work. Validate. Use evaluation tools, WCAG >>guidelines and checklist www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT. >> >WC:: yes, I like this. HB: So do I. > >--wendy Regards/Harvey >
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 13:07:21 UTC