- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:09:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Sophie Latulippe <lsophie@total.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Sophie, sorry to hear about your accident - I hope your are well recovered. I agree that objective criticism is valuable, and that we must realise that there are things which are not accessible, and cannot be made accessible using current technology, but which are nevertheless sufficiently valuable to people who can use them that they will be retained. I also agree that we should not aim to deprive people of what they have, but seek to enable people who do not have access. I think this article demonstrates that there are people who are extremely paranoid about the possible requirements, and will therefore resist the idea of accessibility without ever taking the time to try and undertand it. Fear, an "us-and-them" fortress mentality, and ignorance are always obstacles, and this group in particular needs to bear that in mind as we explore ways of improving the accessibility of the web for all who seek to use it. Charles McCN On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Sophie Latulippe wrote: Dear eo members, I have not been very active since March: I had an accident and a long rehabilitation. It was hard to me to keep up with EO activities. Anyways, I am sending this email following an article that i read at http://www.reasonmag.com:80/9907/fe.ap.is.html. At first I had a somewhat aggressive attitude towards this article which is a bit critical opinion about accessinility on the web. Then I admit that I found quite enriching to see both sides of the coin and that it can be even helpful to acknowledge opposite views in order to be more effective in advocating web accessibility. Moreover, I as I once said, from time to time I write articles about assistive technology and web accessibility. I find that the les biased, the more objective we look, the more efficient we are at convincing other people. I can even admit, not without some imcomfort, that I sometimes struggle with ethical issues related to web accessibility. Although, since I have cerebral palsy, I am very pleased when sites are accessible. Although I can read, using voice browsers are much easier to me. I know this email is very paradoxical, but I trust some of you to see some logic in what I write and point controversial articles that I could use in my work. I would like to add, if I am not the only person who struggles with that kind of doubt, that we should not be ashamed of it, acknowledge it and then, move forward. That is what I intend to do... Thank you Sophie
Received on Friday, 25 June 1999 18:09:24 UTC