W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: WAI EOWG Agenda, April 2

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 19:45:17 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990405194517.011e0d30@localhost>
To: "Robert Neff" <rneff@moon.jic.com>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Rob,

Yes, good idea. I think I need to put some of this info on multiple slides,
and spell it out more.

Judy

At 06:47 AM 4/3/99 -0800, Robert Neff wrote:
>Here is a comment on slide 8.  This slide says, "major sponsors include: US
>NSF, US DOE NIDRR, EC TIDE, Government of Canada, IBM/Lotus, Microsoft "
>
>Do we need to add the accronym tag and suggest this should be written as,
>"major sponsors include: U.S. NSF, U.S. D.O.E.  "  What about the other
>Acronyms?  I would even consider spelling out NSF and DOE.  Periods need to
>be used on acronyms, because if the pwWebSpeak and other browsers are not
>set up to read "US" as United States, it will read it as 'us''; it will try
>to pronounce 'NSF" and will pronounce 'DOE" as the female deer, 'doe'.
>
>I remember the first time i used pwWebSpeak to test the site at Dpetartment
>of Labor, the accronym 'DOL' was pronounced doll!
>
>Also, may want to look elsewhere on the slides where we use accronyms.
>
>
>/rob
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
>To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
>Date: Thursday, April 01, 1999 7:54 PM
>Subject: WAI EOWG Agenda, April 2
>
>
>>WAI EOWG, Agenda for April 2, 1999
>>
>> Time: 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. US EST
>> Phone bridge: US: +1 (617) 252-1038
>>
>>AGENDA
>>
>>1) Outreach & Updates
>>- presentations given, presentations upcoming, key events to cover, etc.
>>
>>2) Review of draft "WAI Overview" on-line presentation
>>- <http://www.w3.org/Talks/1999/0401-wai-jb/>
>>- clear? sufficiently self-explanatory?
>>- useful? engaging/annoying? major gaps?
>>
>>3) Review of FAQ draft (by phone only, not circulating)
>>
>>4) Exploration of "templates" idea in lieu (at least temporarily) of demo
>>sites
>>- look at "W3C Core Styles" <http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/Core/>
>>- is it possible for us to do something similar for accessiblity?
>>- if so, what would be in the series?
>>- development time & resources?
>>
>>5) Collection of reliable public sites
>>- nominations?
>>- feasibility of identifying, maintaining?
>>
>>6) Review of materials priorities & status over the next month
>>[tentative only!!]
>>- press FAQ
>>- curriculum: WCAG
>>- curriculum: WAI Overview
>>- tech note: CSS
>>- tech note: HTML
>>- tech note: SMIL
>>- general ref: core note
>>- ??general ref: business case
>>- ??demos: demo sites or templates
>>- film: RNIB film
>>- ??webcast: moving it onto a Web site
>>- resource page: alternative browsers
>>- resource page: clean up reference page
>>- resource page: events calendar
>>- hard copy: reprints of literature stuffers
>>- ??hard copy: bookmarks? (IC: English/French back-to-back)
>>- ??hard copy: brochures (??)
>>- ?translations: coordination
>>- ??reporting tool
>>
>>7) Next meetings
>>- on EOWG home page <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#Calls:>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----------
>>Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
>>Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
>>World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>>MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
>>
>>
>
----------
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 1999 10:55:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:28 UTC