- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:49:34 +0100
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I agree, and well done for moving it along so quickly once things were in place! -Alastair On 30/06/2015 14:22, <jrichards@ocadu.ca> wrote: >I agree to moving ATAG 2.0 along to the next step (Proposed >Recommendation Status). > >Cheers, >Jan > >(MR) JAN RICHARDS >PROJECT MANAGER >INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) >OCAD UNIVERSITY > >T 416 977 6000 x3957 >F 416 977 9844 >E jrichards@ocadu.ca > >________________________________________ >From: Treviranus, Jutta (Academic) [jtreviranus@ocadu.ca] >Sent: June-29-15 4:20 PM >To: AUWG >Subject: Call for ATAG WG Consensus: Moving ATAG 2.0 to Proposed >Recommendation Status > >Dear ATAG WG Members: > >This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to move ATAG 2.0 to Proposed >Recommendation status on the basis that the ATAG 2.0 Implementation >Report has demonstrated sufficient authoring tool implementation to meet >the exit criteria: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-ATAG20-20150604/#exit > >The CfC is now open via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, >though messages of support are welcome. > >If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this >proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later >than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Sunday 5 July 2015. > >Thanks >Jutta Treviranus >AUWG Chair > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2015 15:50:09 UTC