Minutes of AUWG teleconfernece of 3 March 2014

HTML version on the Minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2014/03/03-au-minutes.html

Text of Minutes:

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                                  WAI AU

03 Mar 2014

    [2]Agenda

       [2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0030.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/03-au-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Jan, Jeanne, Tim_Boland, Jutta

    Regrets
           TomB

    Chair
           jutta Treviranus

    Scribe
           jeanne

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]1. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update
          2. [6]2. Gathering and building the "Tools and Resources
             Needed for Testing ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:"
          3. [7]Test of Testing Procedure
          4. [8]Implementation Report Update
          5. [9]Meeting on 17 March?
      * [10]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <Jan> Chair: Jutta Treviranus

    <Jan>
    [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0
    030.html

      [11] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0030.html

1. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update

    <Jan> JS: Don't have an update

    <Jan> JS: MC usually works on this on Friday

2. Gathering and building the "Tools and Resources Needed for Testing
ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:"

    <Jan> TB: Group still trying this out

    <Jan> JR: Explains accessible, inaccessible test files

    <Jan> [12]http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#gl_b31

      [12] http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#gl_b31

    [extensive discussion on the depth necessary to test WCAG
    failures]

    JS: I don't think we need to test WCAG exhaustively for ATAG
    CR. WCAG is already proven. I recommend using the Before of the
    WAI Before and After Demo, because it gives a good overview of
    basic accessibility failures. A checker that misses those,
    clearly won't pass ATAG 2.0. A checker that passes all of them
    may miss more subtle errors, but it is sufficient to pass the
    ATAG CR Exit Criteria.

    Unfortunately, I don't think we have the time or resources to
    build an exhaustive WCAG test failure document.

    JR: Ok, I'll look into that for next week.

    <scribe> scribe: jeanne

Test of Testing Procedure

    JS: Jan and possible Tom were working on that. That is taking
    second to the testing files, because we can't start the test
    without the files.

Implementation Report Update

    JS: No new implementations

Meeting on 17 March?

    JS: That is CSUN week. I will be traveling on Tuesday the 18th,
    so I can attend the 17th meeting. I don't know about Tim
    Boland. He may already be there on Monday. We should discuss it
    next week.

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]

Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 19:00:08 UTC