RE: ATAG2 Conformance section update proposal

Don't know if there is a call today, however, due to travel I will be unable to attend.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocad.ca] 
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:41 AM
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: re: ATAG2 Conformance section update proposal

Survey questions re: Conformance section update proposal (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0090.html):

1. Addition of the "Success Criteria Satisfaction" sub-section to the Conformance section.
Accept the proposal
Recommend changes (see comments field)
The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field) Disagree with the proposal Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

2. Phrasing of the "ATAG 2.0 Conformance (Level A, AA, or AAA)" section Accept the proposal Recommend changes (see comments field) The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field) Disagree with the proposal Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

3. Phrasing of the "Statement of Partial ATAG 2.0 Conformance - Process Component (Level A, AA, or AAA)" section Accept the proposal Recommend changes (see comments field) The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field) Disagree with the proposal Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group

4. Note added at the top of Conformance Claims section: "Note: As with any software application, authoring tools can be collections of components. As with a legal claim, a conformance claim can only be made by a responsible entity. Any other attempted "claims" are, in fact, reviews. "
Accept the proposal
Recommend changes (see comments field)
The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field) Disagree with the proposal Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group


Cheers,
Jan






(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) OCAD University

Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 18:49:47 UTC