- From: Sueann Nichols <ssnichol@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:41:20 -0400
- To: jrichards@ocad.ca, Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 15:20:35 UTC
Hello, Overall the responses seem reasonable. I do have a concern with one of the blocking issues raised on the conformance claim. Why is ATAG not using the same or very similar conformance claim from WCAG 2.0? Given that's language people are now familiar with, wouldn't it make sense to be consistent with that language? Reference: The link to the comments is here: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/atag20-8Jul10LC-comments-updated14july2011.html Sueann Nichols Phone: (720) 396-6739 (t/l) 938-6739 ssnichol@us.ibm.com IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 15:20:35 UTC