Review of ATAG responses to IBM comments

Hello,

Overall the responses seem reasonable. I do have a concern with one of the
blocking issues raised on the conformance claim.  Why is ATAG not using the
same or  very similar conformance claim from WCAG 2.0?   Given that's
language people are now familiar with, wouldn't it make sense to be
consistent with that language?

Reference:
The link to the comments is here:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/atag20-8Jul10LC-comments-updated14july2011.html



Sueann Nichols

Phone: (720) 396-6739 (t/l) 938-6739
ssnichol@us.ibm.com
IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center
http://www.ibm.com/able

Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 15:20:35 UTC