- From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:03:28 -0400
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308D148F45F@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Going through spec a little at a time.. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST B.1.2.1 - What is a "restructuring transformation"? Please define.. I see a definition for "content transformations" but how is this different? same with "recoding transformations" - how is recoding different from restructuring? What is being transformed? Is there a defined begin and end point of a transformation? for (a) - what exactly constitutes - accessibility information - (I know we define it, but do we need to change definition in light of recent discussions)? Does this relate to the "WCAG-capable" discussion at the last teleconference? "All" accessibility information? Some? How much is sufficient? What exactly does it mean to "preserve" -information- (or how can one objectively test that -information- has been "preserved" (for example, is it the semantics of the -information- in a different form, or does the syntax/representation of the -information- have to be the same? Is the -output- the output of the -transformation- (are we "comparing" the output to the input at predetermined points in time?) for (b) - the comments I made for the beginning of B.1.1.2 ("author", "default option", "authoring tools provide a warning" - suggested wording, etc.) apply here as well.. see comments for (a) above re: accessibility information (typo - should have same term as part (a) for consistency - for example, (a) has (WCAG) here but (b) doesn't?) "All" or "some" accessibility information may be lost (is it possible to "quantify")? Does the warning always occur before the transformation is initiated? Is there always evidence of the warning in some modality? I think that there is always a possibility that information may be lost when any change (transformation) is made, so I'm not sure what additional benefit the "may be lost" gives (unless there's a much higher probability of loss when certain changes (tranformations) occur? It depends on the nature of the transformation (who/what has control over the end state of the transformation, how "drastic" the transformation is, how many transformations take place, etc.). For example, a minor change of one word or tag entirely within an authoring tool would seem to be less drastic than when the entire contents are transferred to an entirely different tool or environment under completely different control.. for (c) how -soon- after the transformation (for example, before another transformation or before exiting the authoring tool?) How much accessibility checking is -automatically- performed (for example, on one element/ word, all elements/all content - how much is sufficient/enough?) On what particularly is accessibility checking performed (not specified).. Also see comments above for "transformation".. Do we need to change our definition of "checking, accessibility" in light of recent WCAG-related discussions? I assume that the accessibility checking is automatically performed by the authoring tool being tested by this SC - is this always true (it's not explicitly specified here)? for (d) , see comments above for (c) - is there always evidence of a prompt for testing purposes? - how much accessibility checking? On what? NOTE - typo - change "criteria" to "criterion" - what exactly is an "output technology" (is this term defined? - I know "technology, web content" is) What specifically is an "-included?- technology for conformance? Could you please explain further and give examples? Does this relate to the ATAG conformance section in some way?
Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 13:03:54 UTC