- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:18:22 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi all, On yesterday's call we continued the discussion of terms that might replace "Accessible Content (WCAG)", which WCAG-WG cautions us against using. Ideas we have considered: ------------------------- "WCAG-Conformant" - directly implies WCAG conformance, which requires only using technologies in "accessibility supported" ways - problematic for ATAG http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JulSep/0061.html) "WCAG-Conformant*" - note the asterisk. May still be confusing. "potentially WCAG-conforming web content" - too wordy "WCAG-capable" was suggested yesterday - for which I took an action to write the proposal (below). Other ideas that I had while doing this action: ------------------------------------------------ "WCAG-Compatible" "Accessible*" - once again using the asterisk. Deciding which term to use: =========================== First, let's look at the term being replaced: accessible content (WCAG): Web content that meets the WCAG 2.0 success criteria (Level A, AA, or AAA). If we really want to be exact, we might say something like: WCAG-capable/compatible content: Web content that could potentially conform to WCAG 2.0 (to Level A, AA, or AAA) as follows: -Conformance Level: the WCAG 2.0 " Conformance Level" requirement is met. -Full Pages: if the content is one or more Web pages, the WCAG 2.0 "Full Pages" requirement is met. -Complete Processes: if the content is a complete process, the WCAG 2.0 "Complete Processes" requirement is met. -Only Accessibility-Supported Ways of Using Technologies: The WCAG 2.0 "Only Accessibility-Supported Ways of Using Technologies" requirement is assumed to be met. -Non-Interference: the WCAG 2.0 "Non-Interference" Requirement is met. But that's getting complicated, so maybe: WCAG-capable/compatible content: Web content that could potentially conform to WCAG 2.0 by meeting the WCAG 2.0 success criteria (to Level A, AA, or AAA). Note: This term refers to potential conformance rather than current conformance so the WCAG 2.0 Conformance Requirements are not required to be met. Second, the term "Accessible [Web] Content" appears ~80 times in the document, so I will simply try to provide some representative examples. (1) A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (WCAG): Web-based authoring tool user interfaces meet the WCAG 2.0 success criteria. (Level A to meet WCAG 2.0 Level A success criteria; Level AA to meet WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA success criteria; Level AAA to meet all WCAG 2.0 success criteria) Becomes: A.1.1.1 Web-Based Accessible (WCAG): Web-based authoring tool user interfaces are WCAG-capable/compatible. (Level A, AA, or AAA as determined by WCAG 2.0) ----- (2) accessible templates (WCAG): Templates that can be filled in to create web content that meets the WCAG 2.0 success criteria (Level A, AA or AAA),... Note: Under these conditions, some templates will result in completely empty documents, which are considered accessible by default. Becomes: accessible templates (WCAG): Templates that can be filled in to create WCAG-capable/compatible content (Level A, AA or AAA),... Note: Under these conditions, some templates will result in completely empty documents, which are considered WCAG-capable/compatible by default. ----- (3) B.2.4.3 Author-Created Templates: If the authoring tool includes a template selection mechanism and allows authors to create new non-accessible templates (WCAG), then authors can enable the template selection mechanism to display distinctions between accessible and non-accessible templates that they create. (Level AA) Note: The distinction can involve providing information for the accessible templates, the non-accessible templates or both. Becomes: B.2.4.3 Author-Created Templates: If the authoring tool includes a template selection mechanism and allows authors to create new templates that are not WCAG-compatible, then authors can enable the template selection mechanism to display distinctions between the WCAG-compatible and non-WCAG-compatible author-created templates. (Level AA) Note: The distinction can involve providing information for the WCAG-compatible templates, the non-WCAG-compatible templates or both. Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 21:18:46 UTC