- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:53:26 +0000
- To: "Boland Jr, Frederick E." <frederick.boland@nist.gov>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0B1EB1C972BCB740B522ACBCD5F48DEB0365CD09@ocadmail-maildb.ocad.ca>
Hi Tim, My comments marked by JR: From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Boland Jr, Frederick E. Sent: August 5, 2011 9:59 AM To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org Subject: comments on Jan's responses - finishing up Part A of ATAG2.0 Still based on June 13 ATAG2.0 draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20110613/ for consistency with earlier comments A.4.1.1 1st bullet - please drop "immediately" due to testability concerns JR: OK 5th bullet - i still think it should be made explicit that the warning is given in advance of the action being "committed" (there should be some time-sensitivity in when the warning is presented to the author) JR: Perhaps: (b) Confirm Irreversible: The authoring tool requires authors to confirm before irreversible actions are committed. A.4.1.2 4th bullet - I think we need a definition of "authoring tool setting" JR: Perhaps: Authoring Tool Settings: Author-configurable settings that control how the authoring tool behaves with respect to authors. Authoring tool settings may be referred to as user preferences, preference settings, options, etc. 6th bullet - what I mean is do the current settings override the default settings or initial settings and do those saved settings persist across multiple authoring sessions? JR: I see, but I don't think we need to get so low level. A.4.2.1 general - I think we should add "by the authoring tool" so it should read "documented by the authoring tool" - makes it clear that we are testing the authoring tool and that the authoring tool actually needs to provide the documentation in some fashion JR: Maybe this would be more clear: The authoring tool includes documentation for all features that must be present to meet Part A of ATAG 2.0 (e.g. keyboard shortcuts, text search, etc.). that's it for Part A - I'll do the same exercise now for Part B but work from the updated 18 July 2011 draft if that's OK??: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20110718/ JR: OK Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 15:53:49 UTC