- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:16:26 -0400
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Jeanne disagreed and I see her point. I'll keep the agreed version. Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University -----Original Message----- From: Jeanne Spellman [mailto:jeanne@w3.org] Sent: November 1, 2010 2:13 PM To: Richards, Jan Subject: Re: ATAG2 B2.1.2 I don't think we can eliminate the "if" clause. it would appear that we are forcing simple authoring tools to provide mechanisms just for WCAG. On 11/1/2010 1:59 PM, Richards, Jan wrote: > On the call we approved this: > B.2.1.2 Set Accessible Properties: If the authoring tool provides mechanisms to set properties of web content (e.g., attribute values, etc.), mechanisms are also provided to gather accessibility information required to meet the WCAG 2.0 success criteria. > > I suggest we simplify a bit more: > B.2.1.2 Mechanisms are provided to set web content properties (e.g., attribute values, etc.) related to accessibility information that is required to meet the WCAG 2.0 success criteria: > Note: Success Criterion B.3.2.4 addresses the prominence of the mechanism. > >
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 18:16:58 UTC