- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:12:59 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- CC: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, I like your shortened version - with a tweak to the short title, since it also doesn't mention highlighting. A.2.2.1 Editing-View Status Information: If an editing-view modifies the presentation to convey status information, then that status information can be programmatically determined. Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University > -----Original Message----- > From: Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com] > Sent: November 1, 2010 12:25 PM > To: Richards, Jan > Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org > Subject: RE: A.2.2.1 wording > > Jan wrote: > > I think even my rewording attempt departed too much from the point that > > the UI might change the presentation rather than the content to > > communicate. > > Oh dear, I opened that up even more then! > > Is there are reason we can't assume that an "editing-view" edits content, and > it is the author that uses the editing-view? > > If we can, I'd have thought we could simplify it to: > > A.2.2.1 Editing-View highlighting: If an editing-view modifies the > presentation to convey status information, then that status information can be > programmatically determined. > > (Note unchanged) > > None of the updates mention "messages" as the title does, so perhaps we change > that to highlighting? > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 17:13:28 UTC