- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:45:33 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Still more to do. Here are the first two: A.1.2.1 Non-Web-Based Accessible: Non-web-based authoring tool user interfaces follow (and cite in the conformance claim) accessibility standards and/or platform conventions that support accessibility. (Level A) Intent of the Success Criterion A.1.2.1: The intent of this success criterion is to ensure that non-web-based authoring tool user interfaces are accessible to authors with disabilities. Since accessibility standards and platform conventions exist for many platforms, those documents are referenced to avoid replication of requirements. Examples that meet the Success Criterion: WYSIWYG on MacOS A WYSIWYG text editor is designed in Cocoa following the Mac OS X accessibility framework including using Accessibility Objects setting attributes for Role, Role Description, Description, Title, Relationship and Value. No custom actions are defined and all actions can be performed through the keyboard. Hit-testing has been implemented to pass current focus to assistive technologies. The recommended and reserved keyboard shortcuts for Apple Human Interface Guidelines and for Mac OS X accessibility are included in the application and not overwritten. The conformance claim includes links to the Accessibility Programming Guidelines for Carbon and the Accessibility Keyboard Shortcuts as applicable. Content Management System on Windows A content management system is written to operate on the Windows XP/Vista operating systems. following the Microsoft's Active Accessibility. The programs uses IAccessible proxies and only implements IAccessible for controls that are not proxied by OLEACC. The conformance claim includes links to the the applicable Microsoft Developer Network documents.
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 18:45:58 UTC