- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:06:59 -0400
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
On the agenda I had definition of "content generation"...my proposal is that we get soften the black-and-white distinction between the two types: PROPOSED: content generation The act of specifying the web content to be rendered, played or executed by user agents. This may refer to information perceived by end users or to instructions for the user agents. Web content is *author-generated* when authors are fully responsible for the web content (e.g., typing markup into a source content editing view, writing captions for audio, etc.). Web content is automatically-generated when programming by the authoring tool developer is fully responsible for the web content (e.g., applying a template, automatically correcting markup errors, etc.). In some cases, responsibility for content generation is shared. For example, an author might request an interactive object be placed on their webpage (e.g., a photo album) and the authoring tool would respond by selecting a template, but the authoring tool might require input from the author as it applies the template. EXISTING: content generation ATAG 2.0 refers to two types of content generation: 1. *author-generated content*: When authors specify content (e.g., typing markup into a text editor, choosing an element by name from a list, entering information into a dialog box). 2. *automatically-generated content*: When the authoring tool specifies content (e.g., applying a template, automatically correcting markup errors, dynamically generated content) as programmed by the authoring tool developer.
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 21:07:51 UTC