- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:37:17 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- CC: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Following up on Tim's point that the Introduction of W3C recommendations are usually Informative, I have the following proposal: We... (a) Move the normative definition of "authoring tool" to the Glossary (b) Place a new note in the "Notes" under Introduction that now begin with "ATAG 2.0 recommends that authoring tools be capable of....". The note will read: 1. The term "authoring tool" has a specific definition in ATAG 2.0. The definition, which includes several normative notes, appears in the Glossary. (c) Move the "Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0" to the "Conformance" section (d) Merge the "This section is informative" statements throughout the Introduction into one statement at the top. Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Lead Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 19:38:12 UTC